Judge Judy

According to her former flatmate, the woman is alleged to have punched a hole in a door. The same source claims she also walked away without settling the rent that was due, leaving the flatmate in a difficult financial position.

The programme centres on a dispute between two former house‑mates, focusing on the serious allegations made by one against the other. It presents a straightforward narrative that hinges on a single, contentious claim, and the tension that arises when personal grievances spill over into legal or financial realms. In the heart of the story, the woman is accused of deliberately punching a hole through a door. Her ex‑roommate insists that the damage was intentional, portraying it as a clear act of vandalism. Alongside this, the same former house‑mate alleges that the woman also walked away without paying the rent she owed, leaving a financial shortfall that has added to the sense of betrayal. Both accusations come directly from the former roommate, who maintains that the two incidents are linked by a pattern of disregard for shared responsibilities. The programme does not introduce any additional characters or events; it simply lays out these two claims and lets the audience consider the ramifications of such behaviour within a domestic setting. Overall, the episode offers a concise look at how a single act—whether a physical breach of property or an unpaid rent bill—can spark a broader conflict between people who once lived under the same roof. The focus remains squarely on the alleged actions and the resulting fallout.