The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst

The documentary team presses on with their probe into Robert Durst, gradually bringing to light material that had previously been kept out of view. They sift through recordings of his telephone conversations from behind bars, piecing together what those calls reveal about his actions and mindset. At the same time, the crew conducts fresh interviews with individuals who had never before spoken publicly about the case. These witnesses, previously silent, now share their recollections, adding new layers to the unfolding picture of Durst’s story.

While confined behind bars, Robert Durst habitually picks up the phone to reach out to individuals who have previously offered him assistance. Among the people he contacts are several acquaintances, but one in particular stands out: a long‑standing friend who continues to aid him despite harbouring a personal secret of his own. These regular calls reveal a pattern of reliance on past allies, highlighting how Durst still depends on the loyalty of those who once supported him, even as the friend struggles to keep his own hidden truth concealed. The frequency of these conversations underscores his ongoing need for connection, and each dialogue serves as a reminder of the bonds forged before his incarceration.

While confined behind bars, Robert Durst habitually picks up the phone to reach out to individuals who have previously offered him assistance. Among the people he contacts are several acquaintances, but one in particular stands out: a long‑standing friend who continues to aid him despite harbouring a personal secret of his own. These regular calls reveal a pattern of reliance on past allies, highlighting how Durst still depends on the loyalty of those who once supported him, even as the friend struggles to keep his own hidden truth concealed. The frequency of these conversations underscores his ongoing need for connection, and each dialogue serves as a reminder of the bonds forged before his incarceration.

As the murder trial concerning Susan Berman gets under way, the prosecution turns its focus back to the unresolved 1982 disappearance of Kathie Durst, the first wife of the accused. In the same hearing, Durst’s longtime associate, Nick Chavin, is called to the dock and delivers a startling testimony that promises to reshape the narrative surrounding the case. The courtroom drama now intertwines the fresh charges with the lingering mystery of Kathie’s vanishing, while Chavin’s unexpected revelations add a further layer of intrigue to the proceedings. Both prosecutors and defence attorneys are now forced to confront how the old disappearance might influence the present allegations, and the jury will have to weigh Chavin’s claim against the established evidence.

As the murder trial concerning Susan Berman gets under way, the prosecution turns its focus back to the unresolved 1982 disappearance of Kathie Durst, the first wife of the accused. In the same hearing, Durst’s longtime associate, Nick Chavin, is called to the dock and delivers a startling testimony that promises to reshape the narrative surrounding the case. The courtroom drama now intertwines the fresh charges with the lingering mystery of Kathie’s vanishing, while Chavin’s unexpected revelations add a further layer of intrigue to the proceedings. Both prosecutors and defence attorneys are now forced to confront how the old disappearance might influence the present allegations, and the jury will have to weigh Chavin’s claim against the established evidence.

In the courtroom, Stewart Altman, who serves both as Durst's attorney and his trusted adviser, is called to testify. As he sits on the witness stand, prosecutor Lewin presses him, alleging that Altman is dodging the questions. The cross‑examination grows tense, and Altman's wife, Emily, who is present, becomes visibly upset as the prosecutor continues his line of questioning. Her distress is evident, underscoring the pressure on the defence team. Throughout the exchange, Altman attempts to answer while maintaining his composure, despite the accusations of evasiveness levied by Lewin. The judge watches as the dialogue unfolds, and the gallery murmurs at tension. Altman's attempts to clarify are met with further challenges, reinforcing Lewin's claim that he is not fully forthcoming.

In the courtroom, Stewart Altman, who serves both as Durst's attorney and his trusted adviser, is called to testify. As he sits on the witness stand, prosecutor Lewin presses him, alleging that Altman is dodging the questions. The cross‑examination grows tense, and Altman's wife, Emily, who is present, becomes visibly upset as the prosecutor continues his line of questioning. Her distress is evident, underscoring the pressure on the defence team. Throughout the exchange, Altman attempts to answer while maintaining his composure, despite the accusations of evasiveness levied by Lewin. The judge watches as the dialogue unfolds, and the gallery murmurs at tension. Altman's attempts to clarify are met with further challenges, reinforcing Lewin's claim that he is not fully forthcoming.