
Still a Mystery is a education/science/factual topics series airing on UK television.
No upcoming airings scheduled
Showing recent airings from the last 3 months. This show may return in the future.
A US soldier meets harm in Upstate New York, and his killers may have been his fellow GIs. A missing man's haunting voicemail is his final clue.
A US soldier meets harm in Upstate New York, and his killers may have been his fellow GIs. A missing man's haunting voicemail is his final clue.
A 10-year-old girl walks home from her friend's house and then mysteriously vanishes. And, a night of celebration ends in murder for a young entrepreneur.
A 10-year-old girl walks home from her friend's house and then mysteriously vanishes. And, a night of celebration ends in murder for a young entrepreneur.
The episode recounts the murders of two young men, Eric Cates and Zachary Lamb. Both killings are presented as separate but linked tragedies, with the focus shifting to the discovery of Eric Cates’ remains. Investigators eventually locate his charred body inside the cab of his own pick‑up truck, a grim find that underscores the violent nature of the crime. While the programme does not disclose further details about Zachary Lamb’s fate, it highlights the stark contrast between the two cases, using the unsettling image of the burnt remains to drive home the seriousness of the investigation. The narrative remains centred solely on these two victims and the unsettling evidence uncovered.
The episode recounts the murders of two young men, Eric Cates and Zachary Lamb. Both killings are presented as separate but linked tragedies, with the focus shifting to the discovery of Eric Cates’ remains. Investigators eventually locate his charred body inside the cab of his own pick‑up truck, a grim find that underscores the violent nature of the crime. While the programme does not disclose further details about Zachary Lamb’s fate, it highlights the stark contrast between the two cases, using the unsettling image of the burnt remains to drive home the seriousness of the investigation. The narrative remains centred solely on these two victims and the unsettling evidence uncovered.
A university student was found dead in her own bed, the cause of death a single, fatal stabbing. Detectives arrived at the scene and, within moments, located the knife used in the attack and identified an eyewitness who had observed the incident. The forensic team logged the weapon and the witness’s account without delay. Although the investigators secured both the murder weapon and a witness almost immediately, the inquiry soon ran into a dead end, with the momentum that had characterised the early stages dissipating. As the days passed, the investigation failed to produce any further breakthroughs, leaving the case effectively stalled despite the early leads.
A university student was found dead in her own bed, the cause of death a single, fatal stabbing. Detectives arrived at the scene and, within moments, located the knife used in the attack and identified an eyewitness who had observed the incident. The forensic team logged the weapon and the witness’s account without delay. Although the investigators secured both the murder weapon and a witness almost immediately, the inquiry soon ran into a dead end, with the momentum that had characterised the early stages dissipating. As the days passed, the investigation failed to produce any further breakthroughs, leaving the case effectively stalled despite the early leads.
The episode recounts the murders of two young men, Eric Cates and Zachary Lamb. Both killings are presented as separate but linked tragedies, with the focus shifting to the discovery of Eric Cates’ remains. Investigators eventually locate his charred body inside the cab of his own pick‑up truck, a grim find that underscores the violent nature of the crime. While the programme does not disclose further details about Zachary Lamb’s fate, it highlights the stark contrast between the two cases, using the unsettling image of the burnt remains to drive home the seriousness of the investigation. The narrative remains centred solely on these two victims and the unsettling evidence uncovered.
A university student was found dead in her own bed, the cause of death a single, fatal stabbing. Detectives arrived at the scene and, within moments, located the knife used in the attack and identified an eyewitness who had observed the incident. The forensic team logged the weapon and the witness’s account without delay. Although the investigators secured both the murder weapon and a witness almost immediately, the inquiry soon ran into a dead end, with the momentum that had characterised the early stages dissipating. As the days passed, the investigation failed to produce any further breakthroughs, leaving the case effectively stalled despite the early leads.
The episode recounts the murders of two young men, Eric Cates and Zachary Lamb. Both killings are presented as separate but linked tragedies, with the focus shifting to the discovery of Eric Cates’ remains. Investigators eventually locate his charred body inside the cab of his own pick‑up truck, a grim find that underscores the violent nature of the crime. While the programme does not disclose further details about Zachary Lamb’s fate, it highlights the stark contrast between the two cases, using the unsettling image of the burnt remains to drive home the seriousness of the investigation. The narrative remains centred solely on these two victims and the unsettling evidence uncovered.
A university student was found dead in her own bed, the cause of death a single, fatal stabbing. Detectives arrived at the scene and, within moments, located the knife used in the attack and identified an eyewitness who had observed the incident. The forensic team logged the weapon and the witness’s account without delay. Although the investigators secured both the murder weapon and a witness almost immediately, the inquiry soon ran into a dead end, with the momentum that had characterised the early stages dissipating. As the days passed, the investigation failed to produce any further breakthroughs, leaving the case effectively stalled despite the early leads.
A university student was found dead in her own bed, the cause of death a single, fatal stabbing. Detectives arrived at the scene and, within moments, located the knife used in the attack and identified an eyewitness who had observed the incident. The forensic team logged the weapon and the witness’s account without delay. Although the investigators secured both the murder weapon and a witness almost immediately, the inquiry soon ran into a dead end, with the momentum that had characterised the early stages dissipating. As the days passed, the investigation failed to produce any further breakthroughs, leaving the case effectively stalled despite the early leads.
A university student was found dead in her own bed, the cause of death a single, fatal stabbing. Detectives arrived at the scene and, within moments, located the knife used in the attack and identified an eyewitness who had observed the incident. The forensic team logged the weapon and the witness’s account without delay. Although the investigators secured both the murder weapon and a witness almost immediately, the inquiry soon ran into a dead end, with the momentum that had characterised the early stages dissipating. As the days passed, the investigation failed to produce any further breakthroughs, leaving the case effectively stalled despite the early leads.
The episode recounts the murders of two young men, Eric Cates and Zachary Lamb. Both killings are presented as separate but linked tragedies, with the focus shifting to the discovery of Eric Cates’ remains. Investigators eventually locate his charred body inside the cab of his own pick‑up truck, a grim find that underscores the violent nature of the crime. While the programme does not disclose further details about Zachary Lamb’s fate, it highlights the stark contrast between the two cases, using the unsettling image of the burnt remains to drive home the seriousness of the investigation. The narrative remains centred solely on these two victims and the unsettling evidence uncovered.
The episode recounts the murders of two young men, Eric Cates and Zachary Lamb. Both killings are presented as separate but linked tragedies, with the focus shifting to the discovery of Eric Cates’ remains. Investigators eventually locate his charred body inside the cab of his own pick‑up truck, a grim find that underscores the violent nature of the crime. While the programme does not disclose further details about Zachary Lamb’s fate, it highlights the stark contrast between the two cases, using the unsettling image of the burnt remains to drive home the seriousness of the investigation. The narrative remains centred solely on these two victims and the unsettling evidence uncovered.
A university student was found dead in her own bed, the cause of death a single, fatal stabbing. Detectives arrived at the scene and, within moments, located the knife used in the attack and identified an eyewitness who had observed the incident. The forensic team logged the weapon and the witness’s account without delay. Although the investigators secured both the murder weapon and a witness almost immediately, the inquiry soon ran into a dead end, with the momentum that had characterised the early stages dissipating. As the days passed, the investigation failed to produce any further breakthroughs, leaving the case effectively stalled despite the early leads.
A university student was found dead in her own bed, the cause of death a single, fatal stabbing. Detectives arrived at the scene and, within moments, located the knife used in the attack and identified an eyewitness who had observed the incident. The forensic team logged the weapon and the witness’s account without delay. Although the investigators secured both the murder weapon and a witness almost immediately, the inquiry soon ran into a dead end, with the momentum that had characterised the early stages dissipating. As the days passed, the investigation failed to produce any further breakthroughs, leaving the case effectively stalled despite the early leads.
The episode follows the case of a young mother of four who vanished without a trace, leaving only her car behind. A large‑scale search operation is launched to locate her, involving numerous volunteers and authorities. As the investigation progresses, attention shifts when one of the individuals taking part in the search becomes a person of interest, turning from rescuer to suspect. The story examines how quickly a routine rescue effort can become complicated by suspicion, and how the disappearance of a mother with four children can ripple through a small community, altering the dynamics of those involved in the hunt.
The episode follows the case of a young mother of four who vanished without a trace, leaving only her car behind. A large‑scale search operation is launched to locate her, involving numerous volunteers and authorities. As the investigation progresses, attention shifts when one of the individuals taking part in the search becomes a person of interest, turning from rescuer to suspect. The story examines how quickly a routine rescue effort can become complicated by suspicion, and how the disappearance of a mother with four children can ripple through a small community, altering the dynamics of those involved in the hunt.
When a dancer was found shot dead inside her own home, the investigating officers set about determining who might have wanted her dead. They examined the crime scene for any sign of a motive, focusing especially on a solitary cigarette that had been left behind. The presence of the cigarette was regarded as a potential lead, prompting the detectives to consider who could have been smoking at the time of the murder and why. Their inquiry centred on uncovering any connection between the victim and the person who might have dropped the cigarette, hoping it would point them toward the perpetrator.
When a dancer was found shot dead inside her own home, the investigating officers set about determining who might have wanted her dead. They examined the crime scene for any sign of a motive, focusing especially on a solitary cigarette that had been left behind. The presence of the cigarette was regarded as a potential lead, prompting the detectives to consider who could have been smoking at the time of the murder and why. Their inquiry centred on uncovering any connection between the victim and the person who might have dropped the cigarette, hoping it would point them toward the perpetrator.
The episode follows the case of a young mother of four who vanished without a trace, leaving only her car behind. A large‑scale search operation is launched to locate her, involving numerous volunteers and authorities. As the investigation progresses, attention shifts when one of the individuals taking part in the search becomes a person of interest, turning from rescuer to suspect. The story examines how quickly a routine rescue effort can become complicated by suspicion, and how the disappearance of a mother with four children can ripple through a small community, altering the dynamics of those involved in the hunt.
The episode follows the case of a young mother of four who vanished without a trace, leaving only her car behind. A large‑scale search operation is launched to locate her, involving numerous volunteers and authorities. As the investigation progresses, attention shifts when one of the individuals taking part in the search becomes a person of interest, turning from rescuer to suspect. The story examines how quickly a routine rescue effort can become complicated by suspicion, and how the disappearance of a mother with four children can ripple through a small community, altering the dynamics of those involved in the hunt.
When a dancer was found shot dead inside her own home, the investigating officers set about determining who might have wanted her dead. They examined the crime scene for any sign of a motive, focusing especially on a solitary cigarette that had been left behind. The presence of the cigarette was regarded as a potential lead, prompting the detectives to consider who could have been smoking at the time of the murder and why. Their inquiry centred on uncovering any connection between the victim and the person who might have dropped the cigarette, hoping it would point them toward the perpetrator.
When a dancer was found shot dead inside her own home, the investigating officers set about determining who might have wanted her dead. They examined the crime scene for any sign of a motive, focusing especially on a solitary cigarette that had been left behind. The presence of the cigarette was regarded as a potential lead, prompting the detectives to consider who could have been smoking at the time of the murder and why. Their inquiry centred on uncovering any connection between the victim and the person who might have dropped the cigarette, hoping it would point them toward the perpetrator.
When a dancer was found shot dead inside her own home, the investigating officers set about determining who might have wanted her dead. They examined the crime scene for any sign of a motive, focusing especially on a solitary cigarette that had been left behind. The presence of the cigarette was regarded as a potential lead, prompting the detectives to consider who could have been smoking at the time of the murder and why. Their inquiry centred on uncovering any connection between the victim and the person who might have dropped the cigarette, hoping it would point them toward the perpetrator.
When a dancer was found shot dead inside her own home, the investigating officers set about determining who might have wanted her dead. They examined the crime scene for any sign of a motive, focusing especially on a solitary cigarette that had been left behind. The presence of the cigarette was regarded as a potential lead, prompting the detectives to consider who could have been smoking at the time of the murder and why. Their inquiry centred on uncovering any connection between the victim and the person who might have dropped the cigarette, hoping it would point them toward the perpetrator.
The episode follows the case of a young mother of four who vanished without a trace, leaving only her car behind. A large‑scale search operation is launched to locate her, involving numerous volunteers and authorities. As the investigation progresses, attention shifts when one of the individuals taking part in the search becomes a person of interest, turning from rescuer to suspect. The story examines how quickly a routine rescue effort can become complicated by suspicion, and how the disappearance of a mother with four children can ripple through a small community, altering the dynamics of those involved in the hunt.
The episode follows the case of a young mother of four who vanished without a trace, leaving only her car behind. A large‑scale search operation is launched to locate her, involving numerous volunteers and authorities. As the investigation progresses, attention shifts when one of the individuals taking part in the search becomes a person of interest, turning from rescuer to suspect. The story examines how quickly a routine rescue effort can become complicated by suspicion, and how the disappearance of a mother with four children can ripple through a small community, altering the dynamics of those involved in the hunt.
When a dancer was found shot dead inside her own home, the investigating officers set about determining who might have wanted her dead. They examined the crime scene for any sign of a motive, focusing especially on a solitary cigarette that had been left behind. The presence of the cigarette was regarded as a potential lead, prompting the detectives to consider who could have been smoking at the time of the murder and why. Their inquiry centred on uncovering any connection between the victim and the person who might have dropped the cigarette, hoping it would point them toward the perpetrator.
When a dancer was found shot dead inside her own home, the investigating officers set about determining who might have wanted her dead. They examined the crime scene for any sign of a motive, focusing especially on a solitary cigarette that had been left behind. The presence of the cigarette was regarded as a potential lead, prompting the detectives to consider who could have been smoking at the time of the murder and why. Their inquiry centred on uncovering any connection between the victim and the person who might have dropped the cigarette, hoping it would point them toward the perpetrator.
In this episode, a mother vanishes from her own house, prompting a police investigation that initially points the finger at one of her admirers. As detectives dig deeper, the focus shifts from that first suspect to another suitor, each new lead raising fresh doubts. The investigators wrestle with conflicting testimonies and the unsettling notion that someone close to the victim might be involved. Tension mounts as each new suspect is examined, and a sudden confession emerges, appearing to provide the breakthrough needed to close the file. The revelation promises to untangle the tangled web of motives and finally explain the woman’s disappearance.
In this episode, a mother vanishes from her own house, prompting a police investigation that initially points the finger at one of her admirers. As detectives dig deeper, the focus shifts from that first suspect to another suitor, each new lead raising fresh doubts. The investigators wrestle with conflicting testimonies and the unsettling notion that someone close to the victim might be involved. Tension mounts as each new suspect is examined, and a sudden confession emerges, appearing to provide the breakthrough needed to close the file. The revelation promises to untangle the tangled web of motives and finally explain the woman’s disappearance.
The programme examines the disappearance of LeRyan Nicholson, a teenager who vanished in 1998. His case lingered unresolved for many years, with authorities unable to determine his fate. In March 2013, a DNA sample taken from a previously recovered body matched Nicholson’s profile, finally confirming the remains were his. The DNA analysis, carried out at that time, provided the definitive link between the recovered remains and the missing teenager, establishing his identity beyond doubt. The DNA evidence, obtained in March 2013, left no doubt that the recovered remains belonged to the missing teenager, establishing his identity. This forensic breakthrough answered the question of who the body belonged to, confirming that the individual recovered years earlier was indeed LeRyan Nicholson.
The programme examines the disappearance of LeRyan Nicholson, a teenager who vanished in 1998. His case lingered unresolved for many years, with authorities unable to determine his fate. In March 2013, a DNA sample taken from a previously recovered body matched Nicholson’s profile, finally confirming the remains were his. The DNA analysis, carried out at that time, provided the definitive link between the recovered remains and the missing teenager, establishing his identity beyond doubt. The DNA evidence, obtained in March 2013, left no doubt that the recovered remains belonged to the missing teenager, establishing his identity. This forensic breakthrough answered the question of who the body belonged to, confirming that the individual recovered years earlier was indeed LeRyan Nicholson.
In this episode, a mother vanishes from her own house, prompting a police investigation that initially points the finger at one of her admirers. As detectives dig deeper, the focus shifts from that first suspect to another suitor, each new lead raising fresh doubts. The investigators wrestle with conflicting testimonies and the unsettling notion that someone close to the victim might be involved. Tension mounts as each new suspect is examined, and a sudden confession emerges, appearing to provide the breakthrough needed to close the file. The revelation promises to untangle the tangled web of motives and finally explain the woman’s disappearance.
In this episode, a mother vanishes from her own house, prompting a police investigation that initially points the finger at one of her admirers. As detectives dig deeper, the focus shifts from that first suspect to another suitor, each new lead raising fresh doubts. The investigators wrestle with conflicting testimonies and the unsettling notion that someone close to the victim might be involved. Tension mounts as each new suspect is examined, and a sudden confession emerges, appearing to provide the breakthrough needed to close the file. The revelation promises to untangle the tangled web of motives and finally explain the woman’s disappearance.
The programme examines the disappearance of LeRyan Nicholson, a teenager who vanished in 1998. His case lingered unresolved for many years, with authorities unable to determine his fate. In March 2013, a DNA sample taken from a previously recovered body matched Nicholson’s profile, finally confirming the remains were his. The DNA analysis, carried out at that time, provided the definitive link between the recovered remains and the missing teenager, establishing his identity beyond doubt. The DNA evidence, obtained in March 2013, left no doubt that the recovered remains belonged to the missing teenager, establishing his identity. This forensic breakthrough answered the question of who the body belonged to, confirming that the individual recovered years earlier was indeed LeRyan Nicholson.
The programme examines the disappearance of LeRyan Nicholson, a teenager who vanished in 1998. His case lingered unresolved for many years, with authorities unable to determine his fate. In March 2013, a DNA sample taken from a previously recovered body matched Nicholson’s profile, finally confirming the remains were his. The DNA analysis, carried out at that time, provided the definitive link between the recovered remains and the missing teenager, establishing his identity beyond doubt. The DNA evidence, obtained in March 2013, left no doubt that the recovered remains belonged to the missing teenager, establishing his identity. This forensic breakthrough answered the question of who the body belonged to, confirming that the individual recovered years earlier was indeed LeRyan Nicholson.
The programme examines the disappearance of LeRyan Nicholson, a teenager who vanished in 1998. His case lingered unresolved for many years, with authorities unable to determine his fate. In March 2013, a DNA sample taken from a previously recovered body matched Nicholson’s profile, finally confirming the remains were his. The DNA analysis, carried out at that time, provided the definitive link between the recovered remains and the missing teenager, establishing his identity beyond doubt. The DNA evidence, obtained in March 2013, left no doubt that the recovered remains belonged to the missing teenager, establishing his identity. This forensic breakthrough answered the question of who the body belonged to, confirming that the individual recovered years earlier was indeed LeRyan Nicholson.
The programme examines the disappearance of LeRyan Nicholson, a teenager who vanished in 1998. His case lingered unresolved for many years, with authorities unable to determine his fate. In March 2013, a DNA sample taken from a previously recovered body matched Nicholson’s profile, finally confirming the remains were his. The DNA analysis, carried out at that time, provided the definitive link between the recovered remains and the missing teenager, establishing his identity beyond doubt. The DNA evidence, obtained in March 2013, left no doubt that the recovered remains belonged to the missing teenager, establishing his identity. This forensic breakthrough answered the question of who the body belonged to, confirming that the individual recovered years earlier was indeed LeRyan Nicholson.
In this episode, a mother vanishes from her own house, prompting a police investigation that initially points the finger at one of her admirers. As detectives dig deeper, the focus shifts from that first suspect to another suitor, each new lead raising fresh doubts. The investigators wrestle with conflicting testimonies and the unsettling notion that someone close to the victim might be involved. Tension mounts as each new suspect is examined, and a sudden confession emerges, appearing to provide the breakthrough needed to close the file. The revelation promises to untangle the tangled web of motives and finally explain the woman’s disappearance.
In this episode, a mother vanishes from her own house, prompting a police investigation that initially points the finger at one of her admirers. As detectives dig deeper, the focus shifts from that first suspect to another suitor, each new lead raising fresh doubts. The investigators wrestle with conflicting testimonies and the unsettling notion that someone close to the victim might be involved. Tension mounts as each new suspect is examined, and a sudden confession emerges, appearing to provide the breakthrough needed to close the file. The revelation promises to untangle the tangled web of motives and finally explain the woman’s disappearance.
The programme examines the disappearance of LeRyan Nicholson, a teenager who vanished in 1998. His case lingered unresolved for many years, with authorities unable to determine his fate. In March 2013, a DNA sample taken from a previously recovered body matched Nicholson’s profile, finally confirming the remains were his. The DNA analysis, carried out at that time, provided the definitive link between the recovered remains and the missing teenager, establishing his identity beyond doubt. The DNA evidence, obtained in March 2013, left no doubt that the recovered remains belonged to the missing teenager, establishing his identity. This forensic breakthrough answered the question of who the body belonged to, confirming that the individual recovered years earlier was indeed LeRyan Nicholson.
The programme examines the disappearance of LeRyan Nicholson, a teenager who vanished in 1998. His case lingered unresolved for many years, with authorities unable to determine his fate. In March 2013, a DNA sample taken from a previously recovered body matched Nicholson’s profile, finally confirming the remains were his. The DNA analysis, carried out at that time, provided the definitive link between the recovered remains and the missing teenager, establishing his identity beyond doubt. The DNA evidence, obtained in March 2013, left no doubt that the recovered remains belonged to the missing teenager, establishing his identity. This forensic breakthrough answered the question of who the body belonged to, confirming that the individual recovered years earlier was indeed LeRyan Nicholson.